|
Post by larry g on May 14, 2004 19:50:52 GMT -5
buck , you better believe it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this country is going to shit under bush's presidency and if people like yyou dont wake up and except tyhe world for how it really is he just might get another four years, then the shit will really hit the fan. its not republicans messing things up any more its bush , hes almost totaly lost his mainstream conservatives.
|
|
|
Post by abisai on May 15, 2004 11:25:08 GMT -5
Dude, it's people like you that make conversations like this unbearable. You keep you blinders, I'm grabbing my earplugs.
|
|
|
Post by JBOY on May 16, 2004 9:17:34 GMT -5
WHO PAYS FOR THESE KIDS EDUCATION. THE POOR FOLKS LIKE US. JUST LIKE WE PAY FOR THESE POLITIIANS TO TRAVEL AROUND THE COUNTRY. WHO SUPPORTS THESE KIDS LOSER PARENTS ON WELFARE OR IN PRISON WE DO.
THE RICH GET RICHER OFF THE POOR HARD WORKING FOLKS LIKE US.
|
|
|
Post by Ken on May 16, 2004 20:18:11 GMT -5
It is very interesting that a Democrat instituted this Welfare Reform. I also think it is VERY interesting that it was Bill Clinton specifically who initiated this Welfare Reform. Probably because he couldn't keep his little thingy in his pants down there in Arkansas (he was getting all his cousins knocked up ) and of course while he was traveling the United States impregnating as many uneducated ghetto chicks as he could find. Oh, and don't forget all the interns he spunked on in the Oval Office. No wonder he didn't do anything about terrorism, he was a very, very, very, very busy man.
|
|
|
Post by Rob G on May 19, 2004 3:44:14 GMT -5
Hey remember when Bill Clinton crushed the REAL george bush in the election that time. That was great. Bill Clinton is God, George Bush Junior is pathetic little boy with zero intelligence and sniffs too much coke. ;D
|
|
|
Post by larry g on May 19, 2004 6:47:48 GMT -5
hmmmmm.
i think ken should read afew more news papers a day and maybe actually read more then the big print.
bill clinton was a revalutionary that started this country in a great direction. peace time or war he was the man. thier was no terrorist attacks on american soil while he was president.
maybe bush should spend a little more time looking for weapons of mass distruction , you know in iraq or under his couch.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Deucedropper on May 19, 2004 15:50:29 GMT -5
Wow that was special. Talk about reading more how soon we forget..... Oklahoma city ,terror, first world trade bombing ....terror.....Somalia terror.....Columbine ....terror .... I know what u will say these are not the same as 9-11 but they are. I do not read the paper either ,perhaps somebody will inform me who was the revolutionary president at the time. You know this should be a forum for dicscussions and opinions not insults and nasty posts and I am even ashamed to have been brought in but Ken has endured personal attacks because of his beliefs right along and I can no longer stand aside and leave him on his own as most of my opinions a his. I just hope that I don't have to hear more biggotry like you are Puerto Rican so you don't know anything and beside here in these forums even opinions are wrong!
|
|
|
Post by abisai on May 19, 2004 17:11:36 GMT -5
Amen Fred Lover.
.
|
|
|
Post by larry g on May 19, 2004 18:32:21 GMT -5
yes your totally right , i have no idea what im talking about. i cant believe i said that. brain fart.
i deleteed the rest of my message because im not playing these gamres.
in fact you are . dont try and bullshit me you just randomly picked a side and went with it. atleast the rest of us actually believe what we are saying.
|
|
|
Post by abisai on May 19, 2004 18:44:38 GMT -5
OK, you got the pass and that's done, so here you go. I try to will use small words so that you can understand: 1)you are wrong 2) you are acting moronic.
1) I'll toss in USS cole, two embassy bombings, Unibomber, Waco Texas on top of Fred's clear list. The president deserves no more credit nor blame for anything like these things, but to say that Clinton was clean is to be clearly blind to the actual facts. Are you blaming Bush for 9/11 and not blaming Clinton for any number of things that happened on his watch? That is what it sounds like and that is so idiotically wrong I can't believe you have the balls to continue arguing.
2) if you insist on conversing here, try bringing an actual argument with things to say. Reading your posts is tedious and becoming a waste of time. If you want to attack people personally, that is among other things gay and immature, but more importantly not the reason I for one come to this site. You say you believe in what you do more than me, that's wonderful. I wish there was an ounce of creedance to that. Before there was Hardball where people of divergant opinions met to rehash serious arguments. Now there is Larryball where people misinformed and half-assed sling personal insults that vaguely approach actual topics. Congradu-fuking-lations.
To everyone not named Larry I apologize for engaging this way. To everyone named Larry you fuking deserve at least as much as this for continuing to make posts that do nothing less than make you come off as an ass. If that is what you think is fun, then so be it. Bring on some more wack ass half thought out quasi-nonsensical mythical point for me to bat right back in your direction. You want it this way from your tone, so I promise to offer nothing but rude and argumentative posts without bringing anything to the table other than to try and pick on you personally, Larry the Liberal as you define yourself and you wish that everyone else could be so mindlessly uniformed so that you could know which way to spit.
|
|
|
Post by larry g on May 19, 2004 20:56:30 GMT -5
very well put buck.
i felt really stupid for my previous post already. i was just responding to kens comments on bill clinton a man i personally respect a great deal. i put it in the same terms as ken posted.plus i have a bad habbit of posting after many hours of no sleep which i must stop.KENS POST WAS DESIGNED TO GET MY GOAT WHICH IT DID. most of the time i can see things from other peoples point of view but with politics for some reason i cant even understand how any half way intelligent person can support bush. its simply beyond me.
this next election is very emotionaly charge for me. I SEE AMERICANS DYING EVERY DAY, BEING BEHEADED AND SUCH. I SEE LESS JOBS , HIGHER GAS PRICES. AND THE ONLY DEFFINABLE POSITION BUSHS HAS IS CONQUERING IRAQ AND NO GAY MARRIAGE. THESE THINGS MAKE ME INSANE SOMETIMES.
as fas taking it to this level , i make a comment on the election or a polition ,then you make a suptel attack at me then i come back at you, then you act with your i dont wanna take it to that level. you started it then you wanna be the mature one. i know that arguement . nice try though
as far as my posts being tedius, I DONT HAVE A 100,OOO DOLLAR EDUCATION AT NOTRE DAME AND I DONT EXPRESS MY POINT VERY ELEGENTLY. VERY OFTEN I GET VERY FROSTRATED BECAUSE I CANT EXPRESS WHAT IM TRYING TO SAY.SO fuck you dont read em . thier is a way to block peoples post. why dont you just do that then you wont have to listen to my uninformed ass.
jsut so you know buck you have never seen me play hardball. and i can take it to any level you want to go. better you just block my posts its better for our friendship.
|
|
|
Post by abisai on May 19, 2004 23:07:05 GMT -5
Done. My routine is to come here after work and run off the mouth about things that keep my mind entertained and it serves as a great source of contact for people I would otherwise not communicate with. I'm not sure if you realized you were offensive in the past and I was in the process of e-mailing you directly when I checked back here to reference something and you had made a lame attack at me and my nominal political position. But dude, if someone attacks Clinton, you can't seriously take that personal, can you? If you attack Bush, I don't give a flying fuck. None of these people even know our names, why should we get angry throwing theirs around. If you refer to my "unbearable conversation" post as a "subtle attack" that was because you were telling me "people like me" were losing the election for Kerry, the Democrats, the war in Iraq (it's gonna take a Democrat to win the war you said), and America in general and that this was going to bring on hell on earth. Maybe you believe that, but I am not buying what you are selling. Agreed, I have never seen you play Hardball by a loooooong shot. ;D Hey you walked right into that, that was for free ha-ha. If I did not respect you I would not respond to you. I just felt like you made really outlandish comments and deserved something back you way. I figured something would came back this way and it's not all that bad, so it's cool. Life goes on. I mostly want to talk about how mad Arabs make me, not Larry. I know I preach too much too, but I try and respect what you believe by not telling you what to think, trying to stay on issue rather than party. That is about the only way to have a sane conversation about anything I believe. Cheers was filmed before a live studio audience. (hey, it's late, I got no more gag closer than that tired one)
|
|
|
Post by larry g on May 19, 2004 23:27:24 GMT -5
me and ken have known each other a long time buck. we have argued on for blood on many hard core levels. when me and him are going at it its best to stay out of the way.
as far as what i said about people like you , i meant . independ voters. that was what was in my head anyway. i dont attack you the way i go after ken because i know your a sensitive cat. i do respect you a great deal ,probally more then you relize thats one of the reasons im trying to convert you to islam. a'salam alakum my brother.
|
|
|
Post by abisai on May 19, 2004 23:59:52 GMT -5
HAHA, Peace to the GODS!!!!!!!! Errr.....
It's all gravy. Game over, you win Mustaffah. Time for the real juice. That's right, a lengthy discourse on the benefits of seventy virgins waiting for you in heaven if you do what ALLAH bids. Side note: I heard audio of Berg video -which was probably worse than seeing it and being able to turn down out audio- and that was the thing that made me realize that these militant Islamists are fucking cultists and nothing short of a Lake of Fire will stop them. It was a creepy sort of ritual they did killing that man and saying Allah's name over and over and over as if it were a holy thing. Not to get too theological, but these guys are Jews no more since 600 AD or something, so they should have nothing like the nonsense they have, but the ramblings in the Koran are very much like that of MADMAN. Perhaps one locked in jail for eight years for theft after all his friends attacked the city where he was held for questioning and had a battle that littered the streets with blood of many dwarves and prostitute beaters who never knew before what it meant to be a MADMAN. Yes, THAT crazy.
Yeah, beddy bye time. Like Slick Rick, "Goodnight"
|
|
|
Post by LARRY G on May 20, 2004 0:15:48 GMT -5
ISLAM IS THE CLOSEST THING AROUND TO SATANISM . THEY BELIEVE IN AN EYE FOR AND EYE A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH. EVEN THE JEWS GAVE UP THIS IDEA AROUND THE TIME OF MOSES. ITS NOT QUITE "DO AS THOU WILL" BUT IT IS CLOSE.
|
|